David Austin

6.0k citations
147 papers · 4.2k · h-index 38

Impact in

Papers in

David Austin

142 papers receiving 4.1k citations

Peers

David Austin
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Applied Psychology 1.3k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 682
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 644
Replace Erik Andersson with:
Erik Andersson Sweden
Jean Paty United States
Ehud Bodner Israel
Kevin P. Conway United States
Johanna M. Jarcho United States
Anja Hilbert Germany
Fuschia M. Sirois United Kingdom
Martina de Zwaan Germany
Ioana A. Cristea Italy
Jill M. Newby Australia
David Austin relative to Erik Andersson Sweden Erik Andersson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Erik Andersson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Austin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Austin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Austin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Austin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Austin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Austin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Austin. The network helps show where David Austin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Austin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Austin Line = papers co-authored together David Austin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 147 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005253
2 2008214
3 2005189
4 2012165
5 2018120
6 2019119
7 200991
8 201191
9 201089
10 201077
11 201875
12 201871
13 200971
14 200871
15 201469
16 201767
17 200567
18 200565
19 200164
20 200863

About David Austin

David Austin is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 147 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (29 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (24 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (20 papers), Identity, Memory, and Therapy (12 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (11 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (11 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (10 papers) and Family and Disability Support Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.3k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (682 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (644 citations). David Austin has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Britt Klein, Jeffrey C. Richards, Kerrie Shandley, David John Hallford, Denny Meyer, Simon R. Knowles, Litza Kiropoulos, Joanna Mitchell, Kathryn Gilson and Filip Raes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Anxiety Disorders, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Psychology Health & Medicine and Trials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact