Clinical Nutrition

7.5k papers and 216.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 7.5k papers published in Clinical Nutrition in the last decades have received a total of 216.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Nutrition usually cover Physiology (3.6k papers), Nutrition and Dietetics (2.8k papers) and Surgery (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Nutrition and Health in Aging (2.2k papers), Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology (1.9k papers) and Diet and metabolism studies (1.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Nutrition are Jens Kondrup, Claude Pichard, María Isabel Toulson Davisson Correia, Matthias Pirlich, Olle Ljungqvist, A. Roberto Frisancho, Dileep N. Lobo, Pierre Singer, Kristina Norman and Tommy Cederholm.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Nutrition

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Nutrition. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Nutrition.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Nutrition

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Nutrition. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Nutrition with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Nutrition more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025