Ta‐Ching Chen

1.2k citations
69 papers · 886 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Ta‐Ching Chen

63 papers receiving 848 citations

Peers

Ta‐Ching Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 296
  • Ophthalmology 106
  • Health Informatics 12
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 62
  • Molecular Biology 210
Replace Eline Elodie Barbara De Clerck with:
Eline Elodie Barbara De Clerck Switzerland
Hui-Jin Chen China
Nelson R. Sabates United States
Yoon Jeon Kim South Korea
Ce Shi China
Lawrence S. Halperin United States
Merve İnanç Türkiye
Wungrak Choi South Korea
İclal Yücel Türkiye
Ta‐Ching Chen relative to Eline Elodie Barbara De Clerck Switzerland Eline Elodie Barbara De Clerck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
Eline Elodie Barbara De Clerck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ta‐Ching Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ta‐Ching Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ta‐Ching Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ta‐Ching Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ta‐Ching Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ta‐Ching Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ta‐Ching Chen. The network helps show where Ta‐Ching Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ta‐Ching Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ta‐Ching Chen Line = papers co-authored together Ta‐Ching Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005127
2 2010103
3 202158
4 202155
5 201450
6 202046
7 202142
8 202437
9 201533
10 201925
11 201321
12 201020
13 201815
14 202115
15 202215
16 201814
17 201713
18 202112
19 202011
20 202411

About Ta‐Ching Chen

Ta‐Ching Chen is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 886 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (20 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (12 papers), Retinal and Macular Surgery (8 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (5 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (5 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (5 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (4 papers) and Ocular Infections and Treatments (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (296 citations), Ophthalmology (106 citations), Health Informatics (12 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (62 citations) and Molecular Biology (210 citations). Ta‐Ching Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Chang‐Hao Yang, Chung‐May Yang, Fung‐Rong Hu, Po‐Ting Yeh, Tzu‐Hsun Tsai, Tzyy‐Chang Ho, Yung‐Feng Shih, Michael B Brimacombe, Fu‐Chang Hu and Chao‐Wen Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Genes, Graefe s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, Translational Vision Science & Technology and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact