Chao‐Wen Lin

1.1k citations
57 papers · 779 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Chao‐Wen Lin

53 papers receiving 762 citations

Peers

Chao‐Wen Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Ophthalmology 93
  • Analytical Chemistry 116
  • Electrochemistry 72
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 94
  • Dermatology 34
Replace Jeong-Hwan Che with:
Jeong-Hwan Che South Korea
Lingli Long China
Boyu Chen China
Wei Zhuang China
Martin Kopáni Slovakia
Mazyar Yazdani Norway
Suneel Gupta United States
Fuqiang Yuan China
Shuangshuang Zhang China
Youdong Wang China
Chao‐Wen Lin relative to Jeong-Hwan Che South Korea Jeong-Hwan Che's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.3×
Jeong-Hwan Che · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Chao‐Wen Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Chao‐Wen Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Chao‐Wen Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Chao‐Wen Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Chao‐Wen Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Chao‐Wen Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Chao‐Wen Lin. The network helps show where Chao‐Wen Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Chao‐Wen Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Chao‐Wen Lin Line = papers co-authored together Chao‐Wen Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202080
2 201864
3 201839
4 201838
5 201337
6 201636
7 202032
8 202030
9 201729
10 201628
11 199927
12 201426
13 201924
14 201922
15 201721
16 201518
17 201716
18 201914
19 201813
20 201713

About Chao‐Wen Lin

Chao‐Wen Lin is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Ophthalmology, Plant Science, Genetics and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 57 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (8 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (4 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (4 papers), Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (3 papers), Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (3 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (3 papers) and Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (93 citations), Analytical Chemistry (116 citations), Electrochemistry (72 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (94 citations) and Dermatology (34 citations). Chao‐Wen Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Chung‐May Yang, Xie Wang, Wenzhi Xu, Yongqun Zhu, Shu‐Lang Liao, Li Yao, Chang‐Hao Yang, Yaolin Liu, I‐Jong Wang and Tzu‐Hsun Tsai. Their work appears in journals such as Plants, PLoS ONE, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry and Genes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact