Ming‐Jai Su

5.2k citations
185 papers · 4.3k · h-index 35

Impact in

Papers in

Ming‐Jai Su

179 papers receiving 4.2k citations

Peers

Ming‐Jai Su
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 376
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 945
  • Biochemistry 182
  • Physiology 139
  • Biochemistry 212
Replace Árpád Tósaki with:
Árpád Tósaki Hungary
Mark A. Yorek United States
Masao Kaneki United States
Cem Z. Görgün United States
Shuai Jiang China
Mohanraj Rajesh United States
Vernon W. Dolinsky Canada
Takahiko Shimizu Japan
Jang Hyun Choi South Korea
Alexander S. Banks United States
Ming‐Jai Su relative to Árpád Tósaki Hungary Árpád Tósaki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Árpád Tósaki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Jai Su

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Jai Su's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Jai Su with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Jai Su more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Jai Su

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Jai Su. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Jai Su. The network helps show where Ming‐Jai Su may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ming‐Jai Su, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ming‐Jai Su Line = papers co-authored together Ming‐Jai Su links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 185 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999159
2 2004156
3 2007132
4 2002116
5 1999109
6 2007108
7 2002107
8 200599
9 200398
10 200873
11 197769
12 200166
13 198463
14 201258
15 198355
16 201153
17 199249
18 200948
19 199948
20 201248

About Ming‐Jai Su

Ming‐Jai Su is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, having authored 185 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (51 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (50 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (11 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (11 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (10 papers) and Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (376 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (945 citations), Biochemistry (182 citations), Physiology (139 citations) and Biochemistry (212 citations). Ming‐Jai Su has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Wen‐Pin Chen, Li‐Man Hung, Shoei‐Sheng Lee, Jan‐Kan Chen, C. C. Chang, Hui-Chun Ku, Mei‐Hwan Wu, Ling‐Ping Lai, C.C. Chang and Tzong-Cherng Chi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomedical Science, British Journal of Pharmacology, Naunyn-Schmiedeberg s Archives of Pharmacology, European Journal of Pharmacology and Toxicon.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact