T. Otto
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Urology top 2%
Papers in
- Surgery 60
- Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments 45
- Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies 26
-
- Renal cell carcinoma treatment 16
- Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research 8
- Co-authors
- H. Rübben (47 shared papers)Michael H. Herzog (12 shared papers)Pascal Mamassian (6 shared papers)S. Krege (19 shared papers)Haluk Öğmen (8 shared papers)G. Lümmen (15 shared papers)H. Sperling (5 shared papers)Μ. Goepel (16 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of Urology (8 papers)Journal of Vision (7 papers)Anti-Cancer Drugs (4 papers)Urology (3 papers)Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
T. Otto
112 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- Sensory Systems 147
- Urology 166
- Cognitive Neuroscience 506
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 252
- Surgery 550
Countries citing papers authored by T. Otto
This map shows the geographic impact of T. Otto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Otto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Otto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by T. Otto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Otto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Otto. The network helps show where T. Otto may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Otto, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 126 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 217 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 157 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 112 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 100 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 88 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 88 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 70 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 64 | |
| 10 | 1993 | 64 | |
| 11 | 2009 | 55 | |
| 12 | 1997 | 48 | |
| 13 | 2010 | 41 | |
| 14 | Improved prognosis assessment for patients with bladder carcinoma. | 1997 | 41 |
| 15 | 2012 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1997 | 34 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 33 | |
| 18 | 2016 | 30 | |
| 19 | 2009 | 30 | |
| 20 | 2017 | 29 |
About T. Otto
T. Otto is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Oncology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (45 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (26 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (16 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (14 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (10 papers), Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research (8 papers) and Urological Disorders and Treatments (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (147 citations), Urology (166 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (506 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (252 citations) and Surgery (550 citations). T. Otto has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include H. Rübben, Michael H. Herzog, Pascal Mamassian, S. Krege, Haluk Öğmen, G. Lümmen, H. Sperling, Μ. Goepel, Holger Gerullis and Renate Meyer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Urology, Journal of Vision, Anti-Cancer Drugs, Urology and Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.