Renate Meyer

4.2k citations
96 papers · 2.6k · h-index 29

Impact in

Papers in

Renate Meyer

91 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Renate Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 820
  • Statistics and Probability 325
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 325
  • Finance 266
  • Global and Planetary Change 433
Replace David Higdon with:
David Higdon United States
Eero Saksman Finland
Johanna Tamminen Finland
Steve Brooks United Kingdom
Michael G. Akritas United States
Robert L. Wolpert United States
Nariaki Sugiura Japan
Antonietta Mira Switzerland
S. L. Singapore
Scott A. Sisson Australia
Renate Meyer relative to David Higdon United States David Higdon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.6×
David Higdon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Renate Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renate Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renate Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renate Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renate Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renate Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renate Meyer. The network helps show where Renate Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Renate Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Renate Meyer Line = papers co-authored together Renate Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 96 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004216
2 1999173
3 1996157
4 2000125
5 2006120
6 2000108
7 199991
8 200871
9 200870
10 200566
11 202260
12 200058
13 200455
14 200953
15 202148
16 200144
17 199842
18 200542
19 200342
20 202140

About Renate Meyer

Renate Meyer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Oceanography and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (34 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (13 papers), Bayesian Methods and Mixture Models (12 papers), Statistical Methods and Inference (11 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (10 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (10 papers), Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference (9 papers) and Marine and fisheries research (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (820 citations), Statistics and Probability (325 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (325 citations), Finance (266 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (433 citations). Renate Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Russell B. Millar, N. Christensen, Jun Yu, Andreas Berg, Christian Röver, Samuel Manda, Guillaume Boileau, S. Krege, H. Rübben and G. Giani. Their work appears in journals such as Classical and Quantum Gravity, Physical review. D, Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact