T E Goldberg

1.1k citations
17 papers · 853 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

T E Goldberg

17 papers receiving 810 citations

Peers

T E Goldberg
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 467
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 464
  • Biological Psychiatry 35
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 227
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 155
Replace M. Dieci with:
M. Dieci Italy
N. Colter United Kingdom
Ikiko Yamashita Japan
H. Wu United States
KF Berman United States
Harvey Wickham United Kingdom
Se Chua United Kingdom
Vittorio Di Michele Italy
Michael T. H. Wong Australia
Jacqueline Spiegel-Cohen United States
T E Goldberg relative to M. Dieci Italy M. Dieci's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
M. Dieci · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T E Goldberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T E Goldberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T E Goldberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T E Goldberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T E Goldberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T E Goldberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T E Goldberg. The network helps show where T E Goldberg may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T E Goldberg, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T E Goldberg Line = papers co-authored together T E Goldberg links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 1989351
2 1990122
3 1991109
4 200597
5
The effects of clozapine on neurocognition: an overview.
199461
6 199542
7 199130
8
Methodological issues in the neuropsychological approach to schizophrenia
198622
9
Further evidence of dementia of the prefrontal type in schizophrenia
19874
10 19904
11 19913
12 19952
13 19952
14 20041
15 19981
16 19891
17 19911

About T E Goldberg

T E Goldberg is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Molecular Biology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 17 papers that have together received 853 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (8 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (3 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (2 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (2 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 papers) and Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (467 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (464 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (227 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (155 citations). T E Goldberg has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include D.R. Weinberger, Manuel F. Casanova, D.G. Daniel, Richard L. Suddath, John R. Kelsoe, D.R. Weinberger, Jean A. Saint‐Cyr, Daniel R. Weinberger, Joel E. Kleinman and David G. Daniel. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, American Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Neuropsychiatry, Biological Psychiatry and Journal of Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact