T. Cos

1.1k citations
28 papers · 789 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

T. Cos

28 papers receiving 771 citations

Peers

T. Cos
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 264
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 291
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 61
  • Emergency Medicine 74
  • Urology 37
Replace Otília Brandão with:
Otília Brandão Portugal
L. Masini Italy
Douglass B. Clayton United States
Shiri Shinar Canada
Alicia Martínez‐Varea Spain
Y. Ville France
Masanobu Shigeta Japan
Joon Hyung Kim United States
Ricardo Palma‐Dias Australia
Sabine Zundel Switzerland
T. Cos relative to Otília Brandão Portugal Otília Brandão's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14.8×
Otília Brandão · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by T. Cos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of T. Cos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by T. Cos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites T. Cos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by T. Cos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by T. Cos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by T. Cos. The network helps show where T. Cos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside T. Cos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with T. Cos Line = papers co-authored together T. Cos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201178
2 199776
3 201573
4 200766
5 201661
6 199860
7 201459
8 200649
9 201247
10 201734
11 201232
12 201131
13 201322
14 200620
15 201216
16 201515
17 201113
18 201312
19 20145
20 19994

About T. Cos

T. Cos is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Epidemiology, Surgery and Molecular Biology, having authored 28 papers that have together received 789 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (13 papers), Autopsy Techniques and Outcomes (10 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (5 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (4 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (4 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (3 papers) and Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (264 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (291 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (61 citations), Emergency Medicine (74 citations) and Urology (37 citations). T. Cos has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Spain and France. Frequent co-authors include Jacques Jani, Mieke Cannie, César Roncero, Ángel Durán, Xin Kang, Carmela Votino, Walter Foulon, Veerle Segers, Fred E. Avni and Marie Cassart. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yeast, Prenatal Diagnosis, European Radiology and Radiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact