Stuart W. Quirk

1.2k citations
23 papers · 911 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Stuart W. Quirk

22 papers receiving 859 citations

Peers

Stuart W. Quirk
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • General Decision Sciences 73
  • Applied Psychology 175
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 328
  • Clinical Psychology 322
  • Social Psychology 182
Replace Beyon Miloyan with:
Beyon Miloyan Australia
Katia M. Harlé United States
Deidre L. Reis United States
Ayca Coskunpinar United States
Benjamin M. Dykman United States
Kiara R. Cromer United States
Konstantinos Ioannidis United Kingdom
Cinzia Giorgetta Italy
Kirstin M. Gatchalian United States
A. George Wilson United States
Stuart W. Quirk relative to Beyon Miloyan Australia Beyon Miloyan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Beyon Miloyan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart W. Quirk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart W. Quirk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart W. Quirk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart W. Quirk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart W. Quirk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart W. Quirk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart W. Quirk. The network helps show where Stuart W. Quirk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Stuart W. Quirk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart W. Quirk Line = papers co-authored together Stuart W. Quirk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997129
2 2011106
3 201282
4 199875
5 199870
6 200560
7 200350
8 201044
9 200843
10 201437
11 201037
12
Cognitive determinants of affective forecasting errors.
201034
13 200128
14 199825
15 200316
16 201516
17 200715
18 200914
19 201413
20 200112

About Stuart W. Quirk

Stuart W. Quirk is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (3 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (73 citations), Applied Psychology (175 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (328 citations), Clinical Psychology (322 citations) and Social Psychology (182 citations). Stuart W. Quirk has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael Hoerger, Milton E. Strauss, Denise M. Sloan, Nathan Charles Weed, Martha X Sajatovic, Richard E. Lucas, Thomas H. Carr, Neil Douglas Christiansen, Benjamin P. Chapman and Paul R. Duberstein. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Assessment, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research, Cognition & Emotion, Industrial and Organizational Psychology and Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact