Michael Hoerger

99 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

Michael Hoerger
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Applied Psychology 319
  • General Decision Sciences 108
  • Clinical Psychology 611
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 356
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 604
Replace Ana A. Baumann with:
Ana A. Baumann United States
Lynn B. Myers United Kingdom
Renee E. Magnan United States
Thomas V. Merluzzi United States
François Beck France
Sarah J. Hardcastle Australia
Austin S. Baldwin United States
Todd Lucas United States
Jonathan B. Bricker United States
L. Alison Phillips United States
Michael Hoerger relative to Ana A. Baumann United States Ana A. Baumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ana A. Baumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hoerger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hoerger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hoerger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hoerger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hoerger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hoerger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hoerger. The network helps show where Michael Hoerger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hoerger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hoerger Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hoerger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 108 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018190
2 2010189
3 2016119
4 2011108
5 201888
6 201887
7 201286
8 200875
9 201269
10 201368
11 201365
12 201361
13 201957
14 201253
15 200847
16 201746
17 201744
18 201044
19 201142
20 201441

About Michael Hoerger

Michael Hoerger is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Applied Psychology and Oncology, having authored 108 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (40 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (13 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (12 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (10 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (8 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (6 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (319 citations), General Decision Sciences (108 citations), Clinical Psychology (611 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (356 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (604 citations). Michael Hoerger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Duberstein, Stuart W. Quirk, Laura M. Perry, James Gerhart, Ronald M. Epstein, Benjamin P. Chapman, Thomas H. Carr, Courtney N. Baker, Nathan Charles Weed and Richard E. Lucas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Psychological Assessment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact