Michael Hoerger

92 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Michael Hoerger
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Applied Psychology 371
  • General Decision Sciences 108
  • Clinical Psychology 706
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 849
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 366
Replace Ana A. Baumann with:
Ana A. Baumann United States
Kimberly Horn United States
Renee E. Magnan United States
Todd Lucas United States
Thomas V. Merluzzi United States
Jascha de Nooijer Netherlands
Megan E. Roberts United States
Andy Hau Yan Ho Singapore
Marij A. Hillen Netherlands
Austin S. Baldwin United States
Michael Hoerger relative to Ana A. Baumann United States Ana A. Baumann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Ana A. Baumann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Hoerger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Hoerger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Hoerger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Hoerger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Hoerger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Hoerger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Hoerger. The network helps show where Michael Hoerger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Hoerger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Hoerger Line = papers co-authored together Michael Hoerger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018181
2 2010180
3 2016114
4 2011103
5 201882
6 201281
7 201880
8 200872
9 201365
10 201264
11 201361
12 201356
13 201954
14 201248
15 201043
16 200843
17 201743
18 201742
19 201940
20 202039

About Michael Hoerger

Michael Hoerger is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Oncology and Applied Psychology, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (45 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (20 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (16 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (16 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (14 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (13 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (11 papers) and Family Support in Illness (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (371 citations), General Decision Sciences (108 citations), Clinical Psychology (706 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (849 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (366 citations). Michael Hoerger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Paul R. Duberstein, Stuart W. Quirk, Laura M. Perry, James Gerhart, Ronald M. Epstein, Benjamin P. Chapman, Thomas H. Carr, Courtney N. Baker, Nathan Charles Weed and Richard E. Lucas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, Journal of Palliative Medicine, Psycho-Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology and Cognition & Emotion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact