Stuart J. Murray

76 papers receiving 959 citations

Peers

Stuart J. Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 147
  • Research and Theory 20
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 27
  • Pharmacy 72
  • General Health Professions 299
  • Philosophy 98
Replace Susan M. Reverby with:
Susan M. Reverby United States
Robbie Davis‐Floyd United States
Elizabeth W. Lindsey United States
Paul C. Burnett Australia
Dana Crowley Jack United States
Sylvia Perry United States
Christine S. Davis United States
Sheila Smith United States
Michael L. Radelet United States
Edward Miller United States
Stuart J. Murray relative to Susan M. Reverby United States Susan M. Reverby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Susan M. Reverby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart J. Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart J. Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart J. Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart J. Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart J. Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart J. Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart J. Murray. The network helps show where Stuart J. Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart J. Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart J. Murray Line = papers co-authored together Stuart J. Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 87 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006231
2 201062
3 199355
4 200349
5 200747
6 200839
7 201534
8 201133
9 200830
10 201328
11 200726
12 201426
13 200625
14 199424
15 200822
16 200822
17 200920
18 201020
19
Critical Interventions in the Ethics of Healthcare: Challenging the Principle of Autonomy in Bioethics
201617
20 201617

About Stuart J. Murray

Stuart J. Murray is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 87 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (12 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (10 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (6 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (5 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (20 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (27 citations), Pharmacy (72 citations), General Health Professions (299 citations) and Philosophy (98 citations). Stuart J. Murray has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dave Holmes, Geneviève Rail, Amélie Perron, Dave Holmes, Éric L. Santner, R. McGrath, Adrian Guţă, Renee D. Diehl, Giorgio Agamben and Ignaas Devisch. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Rhetoric, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Nursing Philosophy, Surface Science and Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact