Stuart J. Murray

84 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Stuart J. Murray
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Research and Theory 18
  • Pharmacy 74
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 18
  • General Health Professions 287
  • Clinical Psychology 196
Replace Susan M. Reverby with:
Susan M. Reverby United States
Dave Holmes Canada
Barbara Katz Rothman United States
Vera Caine Canada
Thomas R. Cole United States
Susan Sherwin Canada
Lynn M. Morgan United States
Christine S. Davis United States
Dana Crowley Jack United States
Michèle J. Eliason United States
Stuart J. Murray relative to Susan M. Reverby United States Susan M. Reverby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Susan M. Reverby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart J. Murray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart J. Murray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart J. Murray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart J. Murray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart J. Murray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart J. Murray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart J. Murray. The network helps show where Stuart J. Murray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart J. Murray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart J. Murray Line = papers co-authored together Stuart J. Murray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 98 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006249
2 201066
3 200365
4 199358
5 200751
6 200840
7
Critical Interventions in the Ethics of Healthcare: Challenging the Principle of Autonomy in Bioethics
201636
8 201135
9 201534
10 201433
11 200633
12 200831
13 201331
14 200828
15 200727
16 200826
17 199425
18 201024
19 200924
20 200923

About Stuart J. Murray

Stuart J. Murray is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Philosophy, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (11 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (11 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (7 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (6 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (6 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (18 citations), Pharmacy (74 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (18 citations), General Health Professions (287 citations) and Clinical Psychology (196 citations). Stuart J. Murray has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Dave Holmes, Geneviève Rail, Amélie Perron, Dave Holmes, Éric L. Santner, R. McGrath, Adrian Guţă, Giorgio Agamben, Renee D. Diehl and Ignaas Devisch. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Rhetoric, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Surface Science, Nursing Philosophy and Philosophy Ethics and Humanities in Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact