Dave Holmes

24 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Dave Holmes
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Research and Theory 12
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 10
  • Occupational Therapy 31
  • General Health Professions 138
  • Clinical Psychology 88
Replace Deborah Spence with:
Deborah Spence New Zealand
Unni Å. Lindström Finland
Sally Hardy United Kingdom
Jan Kåre Hummelvoll Norway
Derek Sellman United Kingdom
Bob Gates United Kingdom
John Playle United Kingdom
Judith Globerman Canada
Tom Mason United Kingdom
Rosie Stenhouse United Kingdom
Dave Holmes relative to Deborah Spence New Zealand Deborah Spence's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Deborah Spence · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dave Holmes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dave Holmes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dave Holmes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dave Holmes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dave Holmes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dave Holmes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dave Holmes. The network helps show where Dave Holmes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Dave Holmes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dave Holmes Line = papers co-authored together Dave Holmes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006232
2
Power and the Psychiatric Apparatus: Repression, Transformation and Assistance
201429
3 201720
4 202118
5
Advanced practice: A clinical or political issue?
200616
6 201214
7 201011
8 202111
9 202310
10
Constructing monsters: correctional discourse and nursing practice.
200310
11 201610
12 20239
13 20175
14 20094
15 20203
16 20213
17 20232
18 20212
19 20242
20 20162

About Dave Holmes

Dave Holmes is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Philosophy and Occupational Therapy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Public Health and Social Inequalities (2 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers), Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (12 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (10 citations), Occupational Therapy (31 citations), General Health Professions (138 citations) and Clinical Psychology (88 citations). Dave Holmes has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Luxembourg. Frequent co-authors include Amélie Perron, Stuart J. Murray, Geneviève Rail, Jean Daniel Jacob, Marilou Gagnon, Patrick O’Byrne and Marie‐Hélène Goulet. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical Nursing Research, The Journal of Sex Research, Policy Politics & Nursing Practice, International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare and Journal of research in nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact