Douglas Brooks

547 citations
30 papers · 342 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Douglas Brooks

20 papers receiving 184 citations

Peers

Douglas Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Literature and Literary Theory 140
  • Classics 38
  • History 63
  • Anthropology 53
  • Museology 16
Replace Abel Abel with:
Abel Abel United States
Lisa Hopkins United Kingdom
Marshall Brown United States
George Campbell United Kingdom
Graham Parry United Kingdom
Peter Davison United Kingdom
Kester Svendsen United States
Philip Martin United Kingdom
Edward A. Bloom United States
Maurice Charney United States
Douglas Brooks relative to Abel Abel United States Abel Abel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Abel Abel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Douglas Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Douglas Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Douglas Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Douglas Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Douglas Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Douglas Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Douglas Brooks. The network helps show where Douglas Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Douglas Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Douglas Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Douglas Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199666
2 199752
3 200236
4 199234
5 200533
6 199425
7 199523
8 197220
9 199913
10 19998
11 19715
12
The Shakespeare apocrypha
20074
13 19933
14
Jonathan Wild and the journal of a voyage to Lisbon.
19583
15
Shakespeare and the Low Countries
20052
16 20032
17 19982
18 19682
19
New studies in the Shakespearean heroine
20041
20 19741

About Douglas Brooks

Douglas Brooks is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Mechanical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Sociology and Political Science and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 30 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (8 papers), Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems (3 papers), Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids (3 papers), Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies (3 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (1 paper), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (1 paper) and Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (140 citations), Classics (38 citations), History (63 citations), Anthropology (53 citations) and Museology (16 citations). Douglas Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Lukas Erne, Ian Donaldson, R. J. Lederich, W. O. Soboyejo, F. M. Leibsle, R. McGrath, Renee D. Diehl, Stuart J. Murray, Henry Fielding and John Ford. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Sixteenth Century Journal, Essays in Criticism, Journal of the American Ceramic Society and Studies in English Literature 1500-1900.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact