Stuart F. Smith

38 papers receiving 737 citations

Peers

Stuart F. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Small Animals 247
  • Animal Science and Zoology 333
  • Management Information Systems 141
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 127
  • Strategy and Management 186
Replace Roger Buckland with:
Roger Buckland Canada
Joanne Elizabeth Martin United Kingdom
Keith E. Walley United Kingdom
Paul Edwards New Zealand
Jay T. Akridge United States
Seamus J. O’Reilly Ireland
Nazatul Shima Abdul Rani Malaysia
Thomas W. Bates United States
Jaime Romero Spain
Kyung‐Do Park South Korea
Stuart F. Smith relative to Roger Buckland Canada Roger Buckland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.4×
Roger Buckland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart F. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart F. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart F. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart F. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart F. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart F. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart F. Smith. The network helps show where Stuart F. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart F. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart F. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Stuart F. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000110
2 199398
3 199273
4 200963
5 199353
6 199849
7 199146
8 199440
9 199335
10 199330
11 199028
12 200022
13 199814
14 200212
15 199211
16 198811
17 199811
18 200010
19 19929
20 20109

About Stuart F. Smith

Stuart F. Smith is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Animal Science and Zoology and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 44 papers that have together received 818 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovation and Knowledge Management (11 papers), Quality and Supply Management (7 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (6 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (6 papers), Bird parasitology and diseases (3 papers), Information Systems Theories and Implementation (3 papers) and Organizational Learning and Leadership (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Small Animals (247 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (333 citations), Management Information Systems (141 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (127 citations) and Strategy and Management (186 citations). Stuart F. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Czechia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include B. O. Hughes, M. C. Appleby, David Tranfield, Gerry Johnson, M. C. Appleby, Morris John Foster, Sandra Barbour Wilson, Brendan Ryan, Alex Schock and John Ross Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Operations & Production Management, British Poultry Science, Management Decision, The TQM Journal and Research in Veterinary Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact