Alex Schock

1.7k citations
63 papers · 1.3k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

    • Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies 9
    • Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics 6
    • Microbial infections and disease research 11

Alex Schock

60 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Alex Schock
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Parasitology 459
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 229
  • Small Animals 159
  • Infectious Diseases 344
  • Microbiology 111
Replace Andreas S. Waldvogel with:
Andreas S. Waldvogel Switzerland
Abhineet S. Sheoran United States
Daniel S. Bradway United States
Fabrizio Passamonti Italy
Beverly McEwen Canada
Maria Ludovica Pacciarini Italy
Caroline Argenta Pescador Brazil
Claudia Muñoz‐Zanzi United States
Jöerg Kinne United Arab Emirates
J. Michael Donahue United States
Alex Schock relative to Andreas S. Waldvogel Switzerland Andreas S. Waldvogel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Andreas S. Waldvogel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alex Schock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Schock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Schock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Schock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Schock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Schock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Schock. The network helps show where Alex Schock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alex Schock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alex Schock Line = papers co-authored together Alex Schock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 63 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001143
2 201487
3 201685
4 200382
5 200270
6 200269
7 200963
8 200963
9 200157
10 201455
11 201144
12 199639
13 200336
14 199835
15 200034
16 200833
17 200630
18 200222
19 201320
20 200920

About Alex Schock

Alex Schock is a scholar working on Parasitology, Microbiology, Small Animals, Agronomy and Crop Science and Infectious Diseases, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microbial infections and disease research (11 papers), Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (9 papers), Toxoplasma gondii Research Studies (9 papers), Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments (7 papers), Parasitic Infections and Diagnostics (6 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (6 papers), Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (6 papers) and Veterinary Oncology Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Parasitology (459 citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (229 citations), Small Animals (159 citations), Infectious Diseases (344 citations) and Microbiology (111 citations). Alex Schock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and France. Frequent co-authors include Elisabeth A. Innes, Hugh W. Reid, A.G. Rae, Stephen W Maley, Paul M. Bartley, C.M. Hamilton, Stephen E. Wright, Timothy R. Crawshaw, D. Buxton and Brendan Ryan. Their work appears in journals such as Veterinary Record, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Veterinary Microbiology, Avian Pathology and Journal of Wildlife Diseases.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact