Stuart A. Allison

115 papers receiving 3.6k citations

Peers

Stuart A. Allison
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 960
  • Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 188
  • Molecular Biology 1.8k
  • Biomedical Engineering 1.2k
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 836
Replace Robert Vácha with:
Robert Vácha Czechia
Dirk Stigter United States
Ali Hassanali Italy
Norberto Micali Italy
Shekhar Garde United States
Steven W. Rick United States
Chester T. O’Konski United States
Guillaume Lamoureux Canada
George D. J. Phillies United States
G. Onori Italy
Stuart A. Allison relative to Robert Vácha Czechia Robert Vácha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Robert Vácha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart A. Allison

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart A. Allison's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart A. Allison with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart A. Allison more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart A. Allison

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart A. Allison. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart A. Allison. The network helps show where Stuart A. Allison may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stuart A. Allison, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stuart A. Allison Line = papers co-authored together Stuart A. Allison links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 116 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1984311
2 1972184
3 1979138
4 1980131
5 1990114
6 1989102
7 198199
8 198698
9 198586
10 196976
11 198464
12 198664
13 199159
14 200556
15 199555
16 199055
17 199654
18 198554
19 198451
20 198050

About Stuart A. Allison

Stuart A. Allison is a scholar working on Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Spectroscopy, having authored 116 papers that have together received 3.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (47 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (31 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (30 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (26 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (24 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (17 papers), Electrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies (8 papers) and Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (960 citations), Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (188 citations), Molecular Biology (1.8k citations), Biomedical Engineering (1.2k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (836 citations). Stuart A. Allison has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include J. Andrew McCammon, J. Michael Schurr, Scott H. Northrup, Hongxia Pei, John C. Thomas, Yao Xin, R. M. Barrer, Anthony M. Granville, M.J. Nicol and Chuanying Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Macromolecules, Biopolymers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, The Journal of Physical Chemistry and Journal of Colloid and Interface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact