Hongxia Pei

420 citations
23 papers · 348 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Hongxia Pei

22 papers receiving 343 citations

Peers

Hongxia Pei
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 116
  • Biomedical Engineering 130
  • Economics and Econometrics 71
  • Spectroscopy 36
  • Inorganic Chemistry 27
Replace Felipe Aparicio with:
Felipe Aparicio Spain
Richard Goddard United Kingdom
Michael Martin Germany
Pieter Saveyn Belgium
Indranil Bhattacharyya India
Gary M. Battle United Kingdom
Elena V. Vorontsova Russia
Alexander MacLachlan United States
Kimberly B. Fields United States
Hongxia Pei relative to Felipe Aparicio Spain Felipe Aparicio's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Felipe Aparicio · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hongxia Pei

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hongxia Pei's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hongxia Pei with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hongxia Pei more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hongxia Pei

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hongxia Pei. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hongxia Pei. The network helps show where Hongxia Pei may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Hongxia Pei, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hongxia Pei Line = papers co-authored together Hongxia Pei links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202162
2 200749
3 202024
4 200824
5 200822
6 201018
7 200717
8 201016
9 200815
10 202114
11 200912
12 202112
13 201011
14 20049
15 20049
16 20108
17 20087
18 20037
19 20226
20 20053

About Hongxia Pei

Hongxia Pei is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Inorganic Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (7 papers), Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (7 papers), Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers), Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies (4 papers), Metal complexes synthesis and properties (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers) and Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (116 citations), Biomedical Engineering (130 citations), Economics and Econometrics (71 citations), Spectroscopy (36 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (27 citations). Hongxia Pei has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and France. Frequent co-authors include Stuart A. Allison, Yao Xin, Shaobo Long, Jingxia Gao, Markus W. Germann, Fangfang Li, Sheming Lu, Wen‐Xin Du, Yanxiong Ke and Jianmin Li. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Journal of Separation Science, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, International Review of Financial Analysis and PeerJ.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact