Steven Vickers

943 citations
40 papers · 622 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Steven Vickers

38 papers receiving 533 citations

Peers

Steven Vickers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Algebra and Number Theory 98
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 343
  • Mathematical Physics 184
  • Geometry and Topology 149
  • Artificial Intelligence 328
Replace Anton Betten with:
Anton Betten United States
Kimmo I. Rosenthal United States
Jean Giraud France
Nick Bezhanishvili Netherlands
Lisbeth Fajstrup Denmark
J. K. Truss United Kingdom
S. Pirzada India
M. R. Darafsheh Iran
J. Łoś Poland
Axel Kohnert Germany
Steven Vickers relative to Anton Betten United States Anton Betten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.1×
Anton Betten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steven Vickers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Vickers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Vickers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Vickers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Vickers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Vickers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Vickers. The network helps show where Steven Vickers may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Steven Vickers, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steven Vickers Line = papers co-authored together Steven Vickers links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993152
2 199347
3 199141
4 200539
5 199735
6 199228
7 200427
8
Locales are Not Pointless.
199426
9 200324
10 199923
11 200722
12 200518
13 200415
14 200514
15 200714
16 200414
17 200312
18
Reasoned Programming
199410
19 20017
20 19946

About Steven Vickers

Steven Vickers is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 40 papers that have together received 622 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (17 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (13 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (11 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (9 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (5 papers), Rings, Modules, and Algebras (3 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (3 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Algebra and Number Theory (98 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (343 citations), Mathematical Physics (184 citations), Geometry and Topology (149 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (328 citations). Steven Vickers has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Samson Abramsky, Peter Johnstone, Andrew W.G. Platt, John Fawcett, Michael D. Ward, Pedro Resende, Susan Eisenbach, Maria Emilia Maietti, Camilla Haw and Bertfried Fauser. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Theory and applications of categories and Polyhedron.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact