Steve Hoppes

20 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Steve Hoppes
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Occupational Therapy 85
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 12
  • Clinical Psychology 96
  • Applied Psychology 18
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
Replace Jodi Teitelman with:
Jodi Teitelman United States
Loree A. Primeau United States
Torunn Hamran Norway
Patricia Crist United States
Marilyn B. Cole United States
Michelle Phoenix Canada
Maare Tamm Sweden
Louise McCabe United Kingdom
Virginia C. Stoffel United States
Priscilla Ennals Australia
Steve Hoppes relative to Jodi Teitelman United States Jodi Teitelman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jodi Teitelman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Steve Hoppes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Steve Hoppes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steve Hoppes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steve Hoppes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Steve Hoppes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steve Hoppes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steve Hoppes. The network helps show where Steve Hoppes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Steve Hoppes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Steve Hoppes Line = papers co-authored together Steve Hoppes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
A service learning is a perfect fit for occupational and physical therapy education.
200542
2 201631
3 200527
4 201024
5 200523
6 200320
7 200620
8 201219
9 200117
10 200316
11 200914
12 201413
13 200012
14 20079
15 20078
16 20058
17 19975
18
Elements of instruction in allied health: do faculty and students value the same things?
20034
19 20072
20
Developing an honor statement for university students in graduate professional programs.
20082

About Steve Hoppes

Steve Hoppes is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Education and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 20 papers that have together received 316 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (8 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (3 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (2 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (2 papers), Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (85 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (12 citations), Clinical Psychology (96 citations), Applied Psychology (18 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations). Steve Hoppes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Chan M. Hellman, Beth DeGrace, Ruth Segal, Lori A. Davis, David M. Thompson, Ricky T. Muñoz and Ken Randall. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Occupational Therapy, The Journal of Psychology, Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, Research on Social Work Practice and Physical & Occupational Therapy In Geriatrics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact