Stephen Yablo
Impact in
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.1%
- Philosophy and History of Science
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 29
- Philosophy 25
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 16
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 7
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 2
- Co-authors
- Agustín Rayo (1 shared paper)David Chalmers (1 shared paper)Alan Sidelle (1 shared paper)Graeme Forbes (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Philosophy (7 papers)Philosophical Studies (6 papers)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (4 papers)Philosophical Issues (3 papers)Analysis (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen Yablo
55 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- History and Philosophy of Science 751
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.3k
- Philosophy 1.0k
- Theoretical Computer Science 29
- Cognitive Neuroscience 323
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Yablo
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Yablo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Yablo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Yablo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Yablo
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Yablo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Yablo. The network helps show where Stephen Yablo may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Yablo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 59 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 347 | |
| 2 | 1993 | 255 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 129 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 93 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 82 | |
| 6 | 1987 | 72 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 61 | |
| 8 | 1985 | 61 | |
| 9 | 1995 | 55 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 46 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 45 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 42 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 39 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 36 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 33 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 17 | 2012 | 30 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 28 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 20 | 2014 | 27 |
About Stephen Yablo
Stephen Yablo is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (29 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (16 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Free Will and Agency (2 papers) and Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (751 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.3k citations), Philosophy (1.0k citations), Theoretical Computer Science (29 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (323 citations). Stephen Yablo has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Agustín Rayo, David Chalmers, Alan Sidelle and Graeme Forbes. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophical Studies, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Issues and Analysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.