Stephen Whyte

39 papers receiving 390 citations

Peers

Stephen Whyte
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Reproductive Medicine 81
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
  • Gender Studies 74
  • Marketing 50
  • Clinical Psychology 80
Replace Jacques Berent with:
Jacques Berent Switzerland
Holden Bamford United States
Sarah Buday United States
Barry Singer United States
Jenifer E. Kopfman United States
Valeria De Cristofaro Italy
Jacinthe Flore Australia
Judith E. Krulewitz United States
Jeffrey Diebold United States
Andrew A. Helwig United States
Stephen Whyte relative to Jacques Berent Switzerland Jacques Berent's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.1×
Jacques Berent · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Whyte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Whyte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Whyte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Whyte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Whyte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Whyte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Whyte. The network helps show where Stephen Whyte may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Whyte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Whyte Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Whyte links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202049
2 202134
3 201834
4 201626
5 201619
6 201818
7 202118
8 201516
9 201715
10 202214
11 201714
12 202412
13 201912
14 201911
15 201810
16
Cognitive Bias and Therapy Choice in Breast Reconstruction Surgery Decision-Making
20229
17 20249
18 20158
19 20167
20 20187

About Stephen Whyte

Stephen Whyte is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Gender Studies, Reproductive Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 42 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (14 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (7 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (7 papers), Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (3 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (81 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (107 citations), Gender Studies (74 citations), Marketing (50 citations) and Clinical Psychology (80 citations). Stephen Whyte has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Benno Torgler, Ho Fai Chan, Robert C. Brooks, David A. Savage, Ahmed Skali, Jordan W. Moon, Uwe Dulleck, Karin Hammarberg, Keith Harrison and Michelle Peate. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Personality and Individual Differences, Economics & Human Biology, Reproductive Sciences and The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact