Stephen Vida

21 papers receiving 559 citations

Peers

Stephen Vida
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 190
  • Health 74
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 44
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 110
  • Biological Psychiatry 20
Replace Derek Norton with:
Derek Norton United States
Sadaf Arefi Milani United States
Tania C. T. Ferraz Alves Brazil
Miguel Arce Rentería United States
Kristen M. George United States
Sayaka Kobayashi Japan
Ryan Seals United States
Nicholas Tilton United States
Joseph Breuer United States
Christine L. Emsley United States
Stephen Vida relative to Derek Norton United States Derek Norton's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Derek Norton · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Vida

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Vida's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Vida with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Vida more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Vida

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Vida. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Vida. The network helps show where Stephen Vida may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Vida, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Vida Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Vida links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201291
2 199473
3 199371
4 201046
5 200042
6 199437
7 200634
8 200232
9 201722
10 199722
11 201421
12 199919
13 201814
14 201113
15 199411
16 199110
17 19998
18 19898
19 19897
20 20122

About Stephen Vida

Stephen Vida is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Physiology, Pharmacology and General Health Professions, having authored 21 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (5 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (2 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (190 citations), Health (74 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (44 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (110 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (20 citations). Stephen Vida has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Serge Gauthier, Louise Carrier, Taha B. M. J. Ouarda, Pierre Gosselin, Martin Durocher, Christina Wolfson, Marie‐Élise Parent, Jack Siemiatycki, Karl Looper and Jérôme Lavoué. Their work appears in journals such as The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, International Psychogeriatrics, Biological Psychiatry and Psychiatric Services.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact