Stephen Sweet

59 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Stephen Sweet
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Gender Studies 279
  • Health 134
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 186
  • Demography 210
  • Sociology and Political Science 722
Replace Steve McDonald with:
Steve McDonald United States
Helen Russell Ireland
Anisa Zvonkovic United States
Stefan Liebig Germany
Ann M. Beutel United States
Stephanie Steinmetz Netherlands
Maxine P. Atkinson United States
Henk Flap Netherlands
Pat O’Connor Ireland
Geoff Nichols United Kingdom
Stephen Sweet relative to Steve McDonald United States Steve McDonald's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Steve McDonald · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Sweet

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Sweet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Sweet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Sweet more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Sweet

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Sweet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Sweet. The network helps show where Stephen Sweet may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Sweet, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Sweet Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Sweet links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992152
2 2004143
3 2003127
4 200558
5 199856
6
Changing Contours of Work: Jobs and Opportunities in the New Economy
200755
7 201451
8
Data analysis with SPSS
200250
9 200249
10 200646
11 201542
12 200441
13 199839
14 200735
15
Understanding fraternity hazing: Insights from symbolic interactionist theory
199931
16 200527
17 201527
18 200624
19 201123
20 201420

About Stephen Sweet

Stephen Sweet is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Gender Studies, Demography and Education, having authored 68 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Work-Family Balance Challenges (25 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (12 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (9 papers), Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences (8 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (8 papers), Human Resource and Talent Management (8 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (7 papers) and Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (279 citations), Health (134 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (186 citations), Demography (210 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (722 citations). Stephen Sweet has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis Moen, Murray A. Straus, Marcie Pitt‐Catsouphes, Raymond R. Swisher, Peter Meiksins, Elyssa Besen, Ellen Ernst Kossek, A. J. Hostetler, Lonnie Golden and Jacquelyn Boone James. Their work appears in journals such as Teaching Sociology, Community Work & Family, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Work and Occupations and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact