Stephen Simpson

577 citations
11 papers · 361 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Simpson

9 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Stephen Simpson
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 171
  • Rehabilitation 19
  • Clinical Psychology 56
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 9
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 26
Replace Amy Streater with:
Amy Streater United Kingdom
Isabel Gómez‐Soria Spain
Estela Calatayud Spain
María Gómez-Gallego Spain
Carol Duff United Kingdom
Jackie Pool United Kingdom
Per Kristian Haugen Norway
William E. Mansbach United States
Hugo de Waal United Kingdom
Paula Hancock United Kingdom
Stephen Simpson relative to Amy Streater United Kingdom Amy Streater's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Amy Streater · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Simpson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Simpson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Simpson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Simpson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Simpson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Simpson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Simpson. The network helps show where Stephen Simpson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Simpson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Simpson Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Simpson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2017111
2 2015100
3 201062
4 201829
5 199925
6 201713
7 201712
8
Is subcortical disease associated with a poor response to antidepressant treatment? Neurological, neurophysical and neuroimaging findings.
19985
9 20214
10 20230
11 19970

About Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Epidemiology, Economics and Econometrics, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (1 paper), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1 paper), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (1 paper) and Economic and Environmental Valuation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (171 citations), Rehabilitation (19 citations), Clinical Psychology (56 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (9 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (26 citations). Stephen Simpson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alistair Burns, Chris Whitaker, Phuong Leung, Lauren Yates, Zoë Hoare, Iracema Leroi, Martín Knapp, Vasiliki Orgeta, Steven Roberts and Esme Moniz‐Cook. Their work appears in journals such as Health Technology Assessment, Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, Age and Ageing, International Psychogeriatrics and BMC Health Services Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact