Stephen Rittenhouse

43 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Stephen Rittenhouse
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Molecular Medicine 766
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 136
  • Microbiology 287
  • Pharmacology 543
  • Infectious Diseases 456
Replace A. Bryskier with:
A. Bryskier France
D P Bonner United States
James A. Retsema United States
J Fung-Tomc United States
Thomas D. Gootz United States
Michael D. Huband United States
Suzanne Chamberland Canada
Norihisa Noguchi Japan
Yigong Ge United States
Kazuki Hoshino Japan
Stephen Rittenhouse relative to A. Bryskier France A. Bryskier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
A. Bryskier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Rittenhouse

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Rittenhouse's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Rittenhouse with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Rittenhouse more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Rittenhouse

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Rittenhouse. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Rittenhouse. The network helps show where Stephen Rittenhouse may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Rittenhouse, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Rittenhouse Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Rittenhouse links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015213
2 2010163
3 2015155
4 2003142
5 2021116
6 2001113
7 200296
8 200295
9 201791
10 200290
11 200287
12 200682
13 201479
14 200773
15 200864
16 200357
17 200154
18 200348
19 200447
20 199442

About Stephen Rittenhouse

Stephen Rittenhouse is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine, Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 43 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (16 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (10 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (8 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (8 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (7 papers), Antimicrobial agents and applications (6 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (6 papers) and Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (766 citations), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (136 citations), Microbiology (287 citations), Pharmacology (543 citations) and Infectious Diseases (456 citations). Stephen Rittenhouse has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include David Payne, Michael N. Gwynn, Rio Nakamura, Masakatsu Tsuji, Yoshinori Yamano, David Holmes, Joshua M. West, Daniel R. Gentry, Naoki Kohira and Akinobu Ito. Their work appears in journals such as Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact