E. S. Thomas

40 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

E. S. Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 148
  • Infectious Diseases 242
  • Clinical Biochemistry 62
  • Geometry and Topology 75
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 108
Replace Tetsuo Nakamura with:
Tetsuo Nakamura Japan
Julien Textoris France
Yukihiro Yamaguchi United States
Takashi Kimura Japan
Wei Deng China
Monica Gupta India
Yoshihiko Nagai Canada
Gisele Facholi Bomfim Brazil
Chiara Cosma Italy
Steven D. Townsend United States
E. S. Thomas relative to Tetsuo Nakamura Japan Tetsuo Nakamura's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.6×
Tetsuo Nakamura · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by E. S. Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of E. S. Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. S. Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. S. Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by E. S. Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. S. Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. S. Thomas. The network helps show where E. S. Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside E. S. Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with E. S. Thomas Line = papers co-authored together E. S. Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014232
2 2020168
3 200895
4 201479
5 201972
6 201766
7 202161
8 201561
9 198254
10 201541
11 200840
12 201833
13 201831
14 198231
15 199325
16 197314
17 197813
18 201412
19 200810
20 201510

About E. S. Thomas

E. S. Thomas is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Applied Mathematics and Molecular Biology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (8 papers), Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems (7 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models (5 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (4 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (3 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (3 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (3 papers) and Gut microbiota and health (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (148 citations), Infectious Diseases (242 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (62 citations), Geometry and Topology (75 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (108 citations). E. S. Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Kate E. Stanley, Dagan Wells, Stephanie Van Horn, James R. Brown, Deepak K. Rajpal, Aaron Spivak, Ganesh M. Sathe, Antonella Napolitano, Andrew W. Nicholls and Sam Miller. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Journal of the London Mathematical Society and Journal of Differential Equations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact