Stephen Prothero

499 citations
21 papers · 242 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Prothero

17 papers receiving 169 citations

Peers

Stephen Prothero
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Health 42
  • Religious studies 28
  • Philosophy 50
  • Anthropology 36
  • Cultural Studies 24
Replace Judith Plaskow with:
Judith Plaskow United States
Kathryn Lofton United States
Arthur McCalla Canada
Vittorio Lanternari Italy
Diane Apostolos‐Cappadona United States
Ada María Isasi-Díaz United States
Anna Strhan United Kingdom
Massimo Introvigne Iran
Jan Platvoet Netherlands
Frank G. Kirkpatrick United States
Stephen Prothero relative to Judith Plaskow United States Judith Plaskow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×
Judith Plaskow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Prothero

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Prothero's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Prothero with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Prothero more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Prothero

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Prothero. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Prothero. The network helps show where Stephen Prothero may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Prothero, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Prothero Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Prothero links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
God Is Not One: The Eight Rival Religions That Run the World--and Why Their Differences Matter
201041
2 200738
3 200136
4
Big sky mind : Buddhism and the beat generation
199527
5 199724
6 199520
7 199113
8 199310
9 20027
10
The white Buddhist
19965
11 20015
12 20173
13 19933
14
Worshiping in Ignorance.
20072
15 20182
16
The Best Spiritual Writing 1998
19992
17 20152
18 20161
19 19981
20 20010

About Stephen Prothero

Stephen Prothero is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations and Education, having authored 21 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mormonism, Religion, and History (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (3 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (3 papers), Religious Education and Schools (3 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (2 papers) and Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (42 citations), Religious studies (28 citations), Philosophy (50 citations), Anthropology (36 citations) and Cultural Studies (24 citations). Stephen Prothero has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Carl Jackson, David C. Sloane, Eugene V. Gallagher and Thomas Pearson. Their work appears in journals such as Religion and American Culture A Journal of Interpretation, Journal of American History, Harvard Theological Review, Journal of the American Academy of Religion and Teaching Theology & Religion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact