Countries where authors publish in Harvard Theological Review
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Harvard Theological Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Harvard Theological Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Harvard Theological Review more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Harvard Theological Review
This network shows the impact of papers published in Harvard Theological Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Harvard Theological Review.
About Harvard Theological Review
The 1.5k papers published in Harvard Theological Review in the last decades have received a total of 9.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Harvard Theological Review usually cover Religious studies (700 papers), Archeology (553 papers), Classics (138 papers), Philosophy (340 papers) and History (267 papers) specifically the topics of Biblical Studies and Interpretation (638 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (366 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (348 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (189 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (152 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (125 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (100 papers) and Medieval and Classical Philosophy (87 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Harvard Theological Review are Morton Smith, Krister Stendahl, Frank Moore Cross, Shaye J. D. Cohen, Eldon Jay Epp, Walter N. Pahnke, Arthur Darby Nock, Ernst H. Kantorowicz, Ross Shepard Kraemer and Birger A. Pearson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.