Teaching Theology & Religion

725 papers and 2.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 725 papers published in Teaching Theology & Religion in the last decades have received a total of 2.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Teaching Theology & Religion usually cover Education (468 papers), Sociology and Political Science (280 papers) and Religious studies (134 papers) specifically the topics of Religious Education and Schools (316 papers), Theological Perspectives and Practices (100 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Teaching Theology & Religion are Richard S. Ascough, Eugene V. Gallagher, Fergal Grace, P.J. Gräbe, Martha Stoddard Holmes, Thomas P. Power, David Kelsey, John K. Simmons, Susan L. Graham and Barbara E. Walvoord.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Teaching Theology & Religion

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Teaching Theology & Religion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Teaching Theology & Religion.

Countries where authors publish in Teaching Theology & Religion

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Teaching Theology & Religion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Teaching Theology & Religion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Teaching Theology & Religion more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025