Stephen Pratten

594 citations
43 papers · 424 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Pratten

38 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Stephen Pratten
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 78
  • History and Philosophy of Science 43
  • Economics and Econometrics 205
  • Urban Studies 33
  • Sociology and Political Science 216
Replace David L. Prychitko with:
David L. Prychitko United States
Bradley W. Bateman United States
Frédéric Lordon France
Richard F. Teichgraeber United States
Andreas Pickel Canada
David M. Woodruff United States
Ricardo F. Crespo Argentina
Mark Peacock Canada
Jeremy Shearmur Australia
S. M. Amadae United States
Stephen Pratten relative to David L. Prychitko United States David L. Prychitko's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
David L. Prychitko · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Pratten

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Pratten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Pratten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Pratten more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Pratten

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Pratten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Pratten. The network helps show where Stephen Pratten may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Pratten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Pratten Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Pratten links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199830
2 199728
3 199328
4 201324
5 201723
6 201722
7
International Encyclopaedia of Economic Sociology
200521
8 199618
9 200517
10 201516
11 200016
12 199616
13 202014
14 200314
15 200813
16 200913
17 200111
18 199910
19 202210
20 20009

About Stephen Pratten

Stephen Pratten is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Philosophy of Science, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Philosophy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 424 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (16 papers), Critical Realism in Sociology (14 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (6 papers), Economic theories and models (5 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (4 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (4 papers) and Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (78 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (43 citations), Economics and Econometrics (205 citations), Urban Studies (33 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (216 citations). Stephen Pratten has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Simon Deakin, Jochen Runde, Philip Faulkner, Clive Lawson, Mark Peacock, Cornelia Lawson, Paul Lewis and Tom Lawson. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Economics, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Journal of Law and Society, Journal of Critical Realism and Television & New Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact