Cambridge Journal of Economics

2.3k papers and 61.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Cambridge Journal of Economics in the last decades have received a total of 61.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Cambridge Journal of Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.5k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (1.1k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (815 papers) specifically the topics of Economic Theory and Policy (951 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (708 papers) and Political Economy and Marxism (591 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cambridge Journal of Economics are Christopher Freeman, Peter Maskell, Engelbert Stockhammer, Geoffrey M. Hodgson, Amit Bhaduri, Robert Rowthorn, Özgür Orhangazi, Keld Laursen, Tony Lawson and Jo Crotty.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cambridge Journal of Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cambridge Journal of Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cambridge Journal of Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Cambridge Journal of Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cambridge Journal of Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cambridge Journal of Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cambridge Journal of Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025