Mark Peacock

545 citations
46 papers · 325 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Peacock

42 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers

Mark Peacock
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 87
  • Economics and Econometrics 139
  • Finance 40
  • General Decision Sciences 7
  • History and Philosophy of Science 15
Replace George Demartino with:
George Demartino United States
Brandon Dupont United States
Andrew S. Skinner United Kingdom
Ricardo F. Crespo Argentina
Yūichi Shionoya Japan
Scott Paul Gordon United States
Adam Smith United States
S. M. Amadae United States
H. Geoffrey Brennan Australia
Richard M. Alston United States
Mark Peacock relative to George Demartino United States George Demartino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
George Demartino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Peacock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Peacock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Peacock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Peacock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Peacock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Peacock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Peacock. The network helps show where Mark Peacock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Mark Peacock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Peacock Line = papers co-authored together Mark Peacock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200337
2 200626
3 201324
4 200919
5 199618
6 200618
7 201716
8
Connecting Science: What we know and what we don’t know about science in society
200516
9 201412
10 200010
11 20149
12 20059
13 20079
14 20018
15 20108
16 19938
17 20008
18 20118
19 20127
20 20007

About Mark Peacock

Mark Peacock is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Philosophy, having authored 46 papers that have together received 325 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Theory and Institutions (11 papers), Economic Theory and Policy (8 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (7 papers), Economic theories and models (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Historical Economic and Legal Thought (3 papers) and Critical Realism in Sociology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (87 citations), Economics and Econometrics (139 citations), Finance (40 citations), General Decision Sciences (7 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (15 citations). Mark Peacock has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael Schefczyk, Clive Lawson, Stephen Pratten, Helen Haste, Lorraine Whitmarsh, Peter Schaber, Claire Russell and Paul A. Roth. Their work appears in journals such as Cambridge Journal of Economics, History of the Human Sciences, Review of Political Economy, Philosophy of the Social Sciences and Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact