Stephen O’Leary

10.2k citations
251 papers · 6.8k · h-index 46

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen O’Leary

241 papers receiving 6.6k citations

Peers

Stephen O’Leary
Comparison fields: 5 of 174
  • Sensory Systems 2.3k
  • Otorhinolaryngology 655
  • Neurology 1.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.7k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 889
Replace Juichi Ito with:
Juichi Ito Japan
Seung Ha Oh South Korea
Robert K. Shepherd Australia
Timo Stöver Germany
Thomas Lenarz Germany
Ilmari Pyykkö Finland
Andrew K. Wise Australia
Jukka Ylikoski Finland
Konstantina M. Stanković United States
Graeme M. Clark Australia
Stephen O’Leary relative to Juichi Ito Japan Juichi Ito's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Juichi Ito · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen O’Leary

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen O’Leary's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen O’Leary with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen O’Leary more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen O’Leary

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen O’Leary. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen O’Leary. The network helps show where Stephen O’Leary may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen O’Leary, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen O’Leary Line = papers co-authored together Stephen O’Leary links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 251 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013205
2 2006199
3 2005184
4 2013157
5 2006156
6 2015148
7 2009142
8 2007125
9 2015118
10 2004104
11 2006102
12 201098
13 199998
14 201697
15 201896
16 200892
17 200992
18 201489
19 201587
20 200687

About Stephen O’Leary

Stephen O’Leary is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology and Neurology, having authored 251 papers that have together received 6.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (94 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (68 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (29 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (28 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (27 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (10 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (9 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (2.3k citations), Otorhinolaryngology (655 citations), Neurology (1.2k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (2.7k citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (889 citations). Stephen O’Leary has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rachael T. Richardson, Graeme M. Clark, Hayden Eastwood, Benjamin Wei, Andrew K. Wise, Gregor Kennedy, Robert Briggs, Luke Campbell, Robert K. Shepherd and David Sly. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, Hearing Research, Audiology and Neurotology, Otolaryngology and The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact