Mark White

95 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Mark White
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
  • Sensory Systems 595
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 984
  • Research and Theory 38
  • Speech and Hearing 179
  • Signal Processing 190
Replace J.R. Boston with:
J.R. Boston United States
John L. Semmlow United States
Matthias Gondan Germany
David Field United Kingdom
Sun Kook Yoo South Korea
Yixin Fang United States
Choo Min Lim Singapore
Conor Heneghan Ireland
Einar Wilder‐Smith Singapore
Ikaro Silva United States
Mark White relative to J.R. Boston United States J.R. Boston's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
J.R. Boston · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark White. The network helps show where Mark White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark White Line = papers co-authored together Mark White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 102 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000309
2 1990201
3 1990135
4 1983114
5 1999102
6 201398
7 198490
8 201590
9
Optimization by Mean Field Annealing
198888
10 199987
11 197764
12 200560
13 200758
14 198852
15 199949
16 198349
17 201447
18 200738
19 201037
20 199734

About Mark White

Mark White is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, Sensory Systems and Electrical and Electronic Engineering, having authored 102 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (20 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (12 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (10 papers), Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization (9 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (8 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (7 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (595 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (984 citations), Research and Theory (38 citations), Speech and Hearing (179 citations) and Signal Processing (190 citations). Mark White has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael M. Merzenich, Michael L. Cheatham, Ian C. Bruce, John Wells, Scott G. Sagraves, David Lubkeman, Ernest F. J. Block, Jeffrey L. Johnson, Gerald E. Loeb and Tony Butterworth. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of research in nursing, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Women and Birth and Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact