Scott Dynes
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 2%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Neural dynamics and brain function
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 3
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
-
- Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology 2
- Superconducting and THz Device Technology 1
- Co-authors
- Bertrand Delgutte (1 shared paper)Peter A. Gloor (3 shared papers)Graeme M. Clark (3 shared papers)Stephen O’Leary (3 shared papers)Mark White (2 shared papers)Ian C. Bruce (3 shared papers)Eric Javel (3 shared papers)Yan Zhao (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (2 papers)The Astrophysical Journal (2 papers)The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (1 paper)Hearing Research (1 paper)Journal of Visual Languages & Computing (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Scott Dynes
11 papers receiving 383 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sensory Systems 162
- Cognitive Neuroscience 266
- Speech and Hearing 44
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 68
- Signal Processing 54
Countries citing papers authored by Scott Dynes
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Dynes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Dynes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Dynes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Dynes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Dynes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Dynes. The network helps show where Scott Dynes may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Scott Dynes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 98 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 96 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2003 | 84 | |
| 5 | 2003 | 11 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 7 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 10 | An improved model of electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve | 1997 | 2 |
| 11 | 1994 | 1 |
About Scott Dynes
Scott Dynes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Sociology and Political Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Communication, having authored 11 papers that have together received 403 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (3 papers), Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology (2 papers), Multimedia Communication and Technology (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper), Data Management and Algorithms (1 paper), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (1 paper) and Superconducting and THz Device Technology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (162 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (266 citations), Speech and Hearing (44 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (68 citations) and Signal Processing (54 citations). Scott Dynes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bertrand Delgutte, Peter A. Gloor, Graeme M. Clark, Stephen O’Leary, Mark White, Ian C. Bruce, Eric Javel, Yan Zhao, Yan Zhao and Jacqueline N. Hewitt. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, The Astrophysical Journal, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Hearing Research and Journal of Visual Languages & Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.