Stephen M. Beard

1.7k citations
40 papers · 1.4k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen M. Beard

40 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Stephen M. Beard
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Family Practice 59
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 196
  • Internal Medicine 56
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 205
  • Nephrology 92
Replace Rachel Halpern with:
Rachel Halpern United States
Li‐Nien Chien Taiwan
Gillian C. Hall United Kingdom
Annika Dotevall Sweden
Marie Mide Michelsen Denmark
Anthony J. Zagar United States
Hae Sun Suh South Korea
Ol'ga Dmitrievna Ostroumova Russia
Fang‐Ju Lin Taiwan
Melanie A. Lane United States
Stephen M. Beard relative to Rachel Halpern United States Rachel Halpern's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Rachel Halpern · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Beard

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Beard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Beard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Beard more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Beard

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Beard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Beard. The network helps show where Stephen M. Beard may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen M. Beard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen M. Beard Line = papers co-authored together Stephen M. Beard links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003234
2 2011203
3 2003146
4 2002134
5 201569
6 200963
7 200259
8 201552
9 200051
10 201346
11 201036
12 201134
13 200723
14 201023
15 201320
16 200119
17 200619
18 200218
19 201517
20 201014

About Stephen M. Beard

Stephen M. Beard is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Psychiatry and Mental health, Nephrology, Microbiology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (15 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research (3 papers), Gout, Hyperuricemia, Uric Acid (3 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments (2 papers) and Bacterial Infections and Vaccines (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (59 citations), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (196 citations), Internal Medicine (56 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (205 citations) and Nephrology (92 citations). Stephen M. Beard has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jeremy Wight, Amanda Hunn, Fiona Clare Sampson, Anke Richter, John Michael Kane, Patricia Thieda, Evelina A. Zimovetz, Sorrel E Wolowacz, Paul Tappenden and Gemma Shields. Their work appears in journals such as Value in Health, Journal of Medical Economics, The European Journal of Health Economics, Health Technology Assessment and PharmacoEconomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact