Stephen Lehmann
Impact in
- Philosophy top 2%
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
-
- Library Science and Information Literacy
Papers in
-
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies 1
- German legal, social, and political studies 1
-
- Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 1
- Co-authors
- Marion Faber (4 shared papers)Friedrich Nietzsche (2 shared papers)Adrian Del (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- College & Research Libraries (2 papers)Notes (1 paper)The German Quarterly (1 paper)Library Resources and Technical Services (1 paper)IDEALS (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign) (1 paper)
In The Last Decade
Stephen Lehmann
5 papers receiving 212 citations
Stephen Lehmann's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Philosophy 105
- Library and Information Sciences 13
- Literature and Literary Theory 52
- Music 9
- Conservation 9
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Lehmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Lehmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Lehmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Lehmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Lehmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Lehmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Lehmann. The network helps show where Stephen Lehmann may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Lehmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Human, All too Human. A Book for Free Spirits Hit paper breakdown → | 1986 | 261 |
| 2 | 1991 | 23 | |
| 3 | College and Undergraduate Libraries | 1994 | 7 |
| 4 | 1995 | 3 | |
| 5 | Aphorisms on love and hate | 2015 | 2 |
| 6 | The year's work in collection development, 1992 | 1993 | 1 |
| 7 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 9 | Women's Studies in Western Europe: A Resource Guide | 1986 | 1 |
| 10 | 1994 | 1 |
About Stephen Lehmann
Stephen Lehmann is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Music, Political Science and International Relations and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musicology and Musical Analysis (2 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (2 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (1 paper), Library Science and Information Literacy (1 paper), German History and Society (1 paper), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (1 paper), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (1 paper) and German legal, social, and political studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (105 citations), Library and Information Sciences (13 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (52 citations), Music (9 citations) and Conservation (9 citations). Frequent co-authors include Marion Faber, Friedrich Nietzsche and Adrian Del. Their work appears in journals such as College & Research Libraries, Notes, The German Quarterly, Library Resources and Technical Services and IDEALS (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.