College & Research Libraries

34.4k citations
2.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy
    • Library Science and Administration
    • Web and Library Services
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources
    • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
    • Research Data Management Practices

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 913
    • Library Science and Administration 509
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 484
    • Web and Library Services 420
    • Library Science and Information Systems 152

College & Research Libraries

1.9k papers receiving 25.4k citations

Peers

College & Research Libraries
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Library and Information Sciences 15.4k
  • Information Systems 17.4k
  • Information Systems and Management 3.1k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 2.9k
  • History and Philosophy of Science 1.8k
Replace The Journal of Academic Librarianship with:
The Journal of Academic Librarianship United States
Journal of Documentation United Kingdom
Library trends United States
Journal of Information Science United Kingdom
Library Hi Tech United States
The Electronic Library United States
Information Processing & Management China
Journal of Library Administration United States
Serials Review United States
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology United States
College & Research Libraries relative to The Journal of Academic Librarianship United States The Journal of Academic Librarianship's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
The Journal of Academic Librarianship · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in College & Research Libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in College & Research Libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in College & Research Libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College & Research Libraries more than expected).

Fields of papers published in College & Research Libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in College & Research Libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in College & Research Libraries.

About College & Research Libraries

The 2.9k papers published in College & Research Libraries in the last decades have received a total of 34.4k indexed citations . Papers published in College & Research Libraries usually cover Library and Information Sciences (1.1k papers), Information Systems (1.1k papers), Conservation (150 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (116 papers) and Information Systems and Management (100 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (913 papers), Library Science and Administration (509 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (484 papers), Web and Library Services (420 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (152 papers), Digital and Traditional Archives Management (143 papers), Online and Blended Learning (113 papers) and scientometrics and bibliometrics research (96 papers). The most active scholars publishing in College & Research Libraries are Robert S. Taylor, Kristin Antelman, Constance A. Mellon, David W. Lewis, Trudi Jacobson, Stephen E. Wiberley, Philip M. Davis, Thomas E. Nisonger, Thomas P. Mackey and John M. Budd.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact