College & Research Libraries

2.9k papers and 30.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in College & Research Libraries in the last decades have received a total of 30.0k indexed citations. Papers published in College & Research Libraries usually cover Information Systems (1.1k papers), Library and Information Sciences (1.0k papers) and Education (279 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (903 papers), Library Science and Administration (504 papers) and Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (479 papers). The most active scholars publishing in College & Research Libraries are Constance A. Mellon, Robert S. Taylor, Kristin Antelman, Robert S. Taylor, David W. Lewis, Trudi Jacobson, Stephen E. Wiberley, Thomas E. Nisonger, Philip M. Davis and John M. Budd.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in College & Research Libraries

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in College & Research Libraries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in College & Research Libraries.

Countries where authors publish in College & Research Libraries

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in College & Research Libraries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in College & Research Libraries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites College & Research Libraries more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025