Anna Otten
Impact in
- History top 5%
- European Political History Analysis
Papers in
-
- Historical and Literary Analyses 4
- German Literature and Culture Studies 4
- French Literature and Criticism 3
- French Literature and Poetry 2
- Samuel Beckett and Modernism 2
-
- Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel 3
- Co-authors
- Simon Schama (1 shared paper)Karen Armstrong (1 shared paper)Denis Hollier (1 shared paper)Antoine Prost (1 shared paper)Janet Todd (1 shared paper)Luce Irigaray (2 shared papers)Stanley Hoffmann (1 shared paper)Carolyn Burke (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- World Literature Today (28 papers)Modern Language Journal (1 paper)The Antioch Review (17 papers)Books Abroad (16 papers)
In The Last Decade
Anna Otten
31 papers receiving 264 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- Literature and Literary Theory 99
- History 83
- Philosophy 87
- History and Philosophy of Science 32
- Classics 22
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Otten
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Otten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Otten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Otten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Otten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Otten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Otten. The network helps show where Anna Otten may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Anna Otten, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1990 | 134 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 90 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 33 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1993 | 31 | |
| 6 | 1986 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1993 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 9 | 1980 | 15 | |
| 10 | 1982 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1968 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1972 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 4 | |
| 18 | 1972 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1981 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 3 |
About Anna Otten
Anna Otten is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Anthropology, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 62 papers that have together received 511 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers), German Literature and Culture Studies (4 papers), French Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (3 papers), French Literature and Poetry (2 papers), Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research (2 papers) and Samuel Beckett and Modernism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (99 citations), History (83 citations), Philosophy (87 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations) and Classics (22 citations). Frequent co-authors include Simon Schama, Karen Armstrong, Denis Hollier, Antoine Prost, Janet Todd, Luce Irigaray, Stanley Hoffmann, Carolyn Burke, Catherine Porter and Alan Friedman. Their work appears in journals such as World Literature Today, Modern Language Journal, The Antioch Review and Books Abroad.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.