Stephen Innes

27 papers receiving 190 citations

Peers

Stephen Innes
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Anthropology 100
  • Marketing 66
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 34
  • History 31
  • Economics and Econometrics 75
Replace Charles B. Dew with:
Charles B. Dew United States
Lorena S. Walsh United States
Loren Schweninger United States
Richard R. Beeman United States
Gilman M. Ostrander United States
Hal S. Barron United States
Ian K. Steele Canada
Frederic Cople Jaher United States
Earl Pomeroy United States
Roger W. Lotchin United States
Stephen Innes relative to Charles B. Dew United States Charles B. Dew's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Charles B. Dew · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Innes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Innes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Innes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Innes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Innes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Innes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Innes. The network helps show where Stephen Innes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Innes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Innes Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Innes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199265
2 198934
3 198129
4 198425
5 198119
6 198916
7 199715
8 199612
9 198311
10 198910
11 19849
12 19857
13 19897
14 19787
15 19815
16 19894
17 19914
18 19934
19 19963
20 19962

About Stephen Innes

Stephen Innes is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Environmental and Regional History (10 papers), American History and Culture (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Race, History, and American Society (3 papers), Australian History and Society (3 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers) and Architecture, Design, and Social History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (100 citations), Marketing (66 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (34 citations), History (31 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (75 citations). Stephen Innes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Christopher D. Clark, William Cronon, Lorena S. Walsh, T. H. Breen, Kevin Kelly, James R. Horn, Mechal Sobel, Kenneth A. Lockridge, Robert J. Cottrol and Russell R. Menard. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, The William and Mary Quarterly, The Journal of Southern History, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact