Stephen Hague

19 papers receiving 569 citations

Peers

Stephen Hague
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 261
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 78
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 117
  • Reproductive Medicine 60
  • Molecular Biology 209
Replace Hiroyuki Takada with:
Hiroyuki Takada Japan
John Ansell United Kingdom
Chen Zhou China
Stefan Wüller Germany
James Ziai United States
Shumin Wu United States
Morteza Aghmesheh Australia
Reza Asadollahi Switzerland
Shi Chen China
Stephen Hague relative to Hiroyuki Takada Japan Hiroyuki Takada's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Hiroyuki Takada · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Hague

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Hague's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Hague with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Hague more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Hague

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Hague. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Hague. The network helps show where Stephen Hague may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Hague, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Hague Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Hague links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1998114
2 200198
3 200287
4
Expression of the hypoxically regulated angiogenic factor adrenomedullin correlates with uterine leiomyoma vascular density.
200081
5 200235
6 201433
7 200229
8 199922
9 200219
10
Motion detection deficits in infantile esotropia without nystagmus.
199715
11 197614
12 200210
13 19799
14 20156
15 20164
16 20194
17 20032
18
Using Focus Technology to Build Front Ends
19912
19 20191
20 19871

About Stephen Hague

Stephen Hague is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 23 papers that have together received 586 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (4 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (3 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (3 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (2 papers), BIM and Construction Integration (2 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (261 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (78 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (117 citations), Reproductive Medicine (60 citations) and Molecular Biology (209 citations). Stephen Hague has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Roy Bicknell, Margaret Rees, Martin Oehler, Sanjiv Manek, I.Z. MacKenzie, Martin K. Oehler, Chris J. Norbury, Lyna Zhang, Lin Zhang and Simaan AbouRizk. Their work appears in journals such as Oncogene, Software Practice and Experience, Journal of Simulation, Computer Physics Communications and Trends in Pharmacological Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact