Stephen Giles

607 citations
17 papers · 462 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Giles

16 papers receiving 447 citations

Peers

Stephen Giles
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 210
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 132
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 87
  • Nephrology 21
Replace Mojdeh Zamyadi with:
Mojdeh Zamyadi Canada
Kosuke Okazaki Japan
Erica Sanders United States
Noemí Moro Spain
Paloma Fernández‐Corcuera Spain
Kathryn I. Alpert United States
Seonah Jang South Korea
Jeffrey Lieberman United States
Eva Gunde Canada
Heike Anderson‐Schmidt Germany
Stephen Giles relative to Mojdeh Zamyadi Canada Mojdeh Zamyadi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Mojdeh Zamyadi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Giles. The network helps show where Stephen Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Giles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Giles Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Giles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2011106
2 201492
3 200990
4 201532
5 200425
6 201722
7 201120
8 201517
9 201515
10 201814
11 200811
12 20057
13 20107
14 20172
15
Fronto-Temporal Connectivity in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Related to Auditory Verbal Hallucinations
20091
16 20231
17 20230

About Stephen Giles

Stephen Giles is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health and Molecular Biology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Phosphodiesterase function and regulation (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Hallucinations in medical conditions (1 paper), Air Traffic Management and Optimization (1 paper) and Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (210 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (132 citations), Biological Psychiatry (11 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (87 citations) and Nephrology (21 citations). Stephen Giles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. McIntosh, Stephen M. Lawrie, Heather C. Whalley, Eve C. Johnstone, Jérémy Hall, T. William J. Moorhead, James McKirdy, Martina Papmeyer, Jessika E. Sussmann and Dominic Job. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Social Work in Health Care, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging, Bipolar Disorders and Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact