Stephen Giles

600 citations
16 papers · 425 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen Giles

15 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

Stephen Giles
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 235
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 220
  • Biological Psychiatry 18
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 127
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 49
Replace Noemí Moro with:
Noemí Moro Spain
Kathryn I. Alpert United States
Arpitha Jacob India
Paloma Fernández‐Corcuera Spain
Mojdeh Zamyadi Canada
Cristian Vargas Colombia
Camilla Langan Ireland
Astrid C. van der Schot Netherlands
Jeffrey Lieberman United States
Diego Librenza‐Garcia Canada
Stephen Giles relative to Noemí Moro Spain Noemí Moro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Noemí Moro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Giles. The network helps show where Stephen Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Giles, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Giles Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Giles links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2011100
2 201489
3 200989
4 201531
5 200424
6 201120
7 201717
8 201515
9 201814
10 200810
11 20057
12 20105
13 20172
14
Fronto-Temporal Connectivity in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia Related to Auditory Verbal Hallucinations
20091
15 20231
16 20230

About Stephen Giles

Stephen Giles is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Psychiatry and Mental health, General Health Professions and Molecular Biology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (4 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Scientific Computing and Data Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (235 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (220 citations), Biological Psychiatry (18 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (127 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (49 citations). Stephen Giles has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Andrew M. McIntosh, Stephen M. Lawrie, Heather C. Whalley, Eve C. Johnstone, Jérémy Hall, T. William J. Moorhead, James McKirdy, Martina Papmeyer, Jessika E. Sussmann and Dominic Job. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Social Work in Health Care, Bipolar Disorders, Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging and BMJ Open.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact