Anna Peel
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Papers in
-
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research 2
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms 2
-
- Congenital heart defects research 1
- Co-authors
- Sophie E. Lind (2 shared papers)David M. Williams (2 shared papers)Dermot Bowler (2 shared papers)Eve C. Johnstone (3 shared papers)Andrew M. McIntosh (3 shared papers)Jessika E. Sussmann (3 shared papers)Jérémy Hall (3 shared papers)Stephen M. Lawrie (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Biological Psychiatry (2 papers)American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics (1 paper)Neuropsychology (1 paper)Journal of Abnormal Psychology (1 paper)Neurology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Peel
6 papers receiving 476 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Cognitive Neuroscience 231
- Psychiatry and Mental health 127
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 95
- Genetics 122
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 86
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Peel
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Peel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Peel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Peel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Peel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Peel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Peel. The network helps show where Anna Peel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Peel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 106 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 105 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 87 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 73 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 68 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 50 |
About Anna Peel
Anna Peel is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 6 papers that have together received 489 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (1 paper), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Congenital heart defects research (1 paper) and Child and Animal Learning Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (231 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (127 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (95 citations), Genetics (122 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (86 citations). Anna Peel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sophie E. Lind, David M. Williams, Dermot Bowler, Eve C. Johnstone, Andrew M. McIntosh, Jessika E. Sussmann, Jérémy Hall, Stephen M. Lawrie, Jacob Raber and Heather C. Whalley. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B Neuropsychiatric Genetics, Neuropsychology, Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.