Stephen E. Weil
Impact in
- Museology top 0.5%
- Museums and Cultural Heritage
- Space and Planetary Science top 10%
- Archaeological Research and Protection
Papers in
- Museology 11
- Museums and Cultural Heritage 10
-
- Art History and Market Analysis 5
- Co-authors
- Michael J. O’Hare (1 shared paper)Earl F. Cheit (1 shared paper)J. Mark Schuster (1 shared paper)Edward C. Banfield (1 shared paper)Karal Ann Marling (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Museum Management and Curatorship (2 papers)The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society (1 paper)Leonardo (1 paper)Curator The Museum Journal (1 paper)Art Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen E. Weil
14 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Museology 125
- Space and Planetary Science 15
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 55
- Urban Studies 62
- Conservation 17
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen E. Weil
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen E. Weil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen E. Weil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen E. Weil more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen E. Weil
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen E. Weil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen E. Weil. The network helps show where Stephen E. Weil may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Stephen E. Weil, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Making Museums Matter | 2002 | 80 |
| 2 | 1991 | 45 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 24 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 6 | Beauty and the beasts: On museums, art, the law, and the market | 1983 | 10 |
| 7 | A Deaccession Reader | 2000 | 7 |
| 8 | A cabinet of curiosities | 1995 | 5 |
| 9 | Art works : law, policy, practice | 1974 | 4 |
| 10 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 11 | El museo y el público | 1999 | 3 |
| 12 | Museums for the New Millennium : a symposium for the museum community | 1997 | 3 |
| 13 | 1984 | 2 | |
| 14 | Fair Use and the Visual Arts, or Please Leave Some Room for Robin Hood | 2001 | 1 |
| 15 | 2003 | 0 | |
| 16 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1985 | 0 |
About Stephen E. Weil
Stephen E. Weil is a scholar working on Museology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Urban Studies, Law and Marketing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 214 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Museums and Cultural Heritage (10 papers), Art History and Market Analysis (5 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (2 papers), Digital Rights Management and Security (1 paper), Historical Art and Architecture Studies (1 paper) and Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (125 citations), Space and Planetary Science (15 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (55 citations), Urban Studies (62 citations) and Conservation (17 citations). Stephen E. Weil has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. O’Hare, Earl F. Cheit, J. Mark Schuster, Edward C. Banfield and Karal Ann Marling. Their work appears in journals such as Museum Management and Curatorship, The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, Leonardo, Curator The Museum Journal and Art Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.