John E. Bowlt

676 citations
91 papers · 311 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John E. Bowlt

50 papers receiving 157 citations

Peers

John E. Bowlt
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 72
  • Museology 22
  • Music 19
  • Literature and Literary Theory 58
  • Urban Studies 29
Replace Thierry de Duve with:
Thierry de Duve United States
Benjamin H. D. Buchloh United States
Andy Warhol
Marsha Meskimmon United Kingdom
Serge Guilbaut Canada
Rasheed Araeen France
Alice Goldfarb Marquis United States
Christin J. Mamiya United States
Lutz Koepnick United States
Dziga Vertov
John E. Bowlt relative to Thierry de Duve United States Thierry de Duve's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Thierry de Duve · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Bowlt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Bowlt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Bowlt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Bowlt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Bowlt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Bowlt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Bowlt. The network helps show where John E. Bowlt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside John E. Bowlt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Bowlt Line = papers co-authored together John E. Bowlt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 91 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197769
2 199427
3 199720
4 197417
5 198714
6 199813
7 198010
8 198010
9 197810
10 197510
11 198210
12
Russian Symbolism and the "Blue Rose" Movement.
19738
13
The life of Vasilii Kandinsky in Russian art : a study of On the spiritual in art
19846
14 19714
15 19774
16 19824
17 19924
18 19814
19 19773
20 19973

About John E. Bowlt

John E. Bowlt is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 91 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Politics, and Modernism (17 papers), Soviet and Russian History (10 papers), Eastern European Communism and Reforms (8 papers), European Linguistics and Anthropology (7 papers), Visual Culture and Art Theory (6 papers), European Cultural and National Identity (4 papers), Central European and Russian historical studies (4 papers) and Art History and Market Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (72 citations), Museology (22 citations), Music (19 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (58 citations) and Urban Studies (29 citations). John E. Bowlt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Bann, Blair A. Ruble, William Craft Brumfield, Jay Clayton, Ann Shukman, Robert C. Williams, Wassily Kandinsky, Alan C. Birnholz, Melvyn B. Nathanson and Robert L. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as The Russian Review, The Slavic and East European Journal, Leonardo, Art Journal and Slavic Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact