Gene Ray

657 citations
19 papers · 199 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Gene Ray

16 papers receiving 144 citations

Peers

Gene Ray
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Urban Studies 57
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 42
  • Museology 25
  • Geography, Planning and Development 10
  • Sociology and Political Science 76
Replace Abigail Solomon‐Godeau with:
Abigail Solomon‐Godeau United States
Gen Doy United Kingdom
Connell Vaughan Ireland
Jen Harvie United Kingdom
Arnd Schneider United Kingdom
Stephen Gundle United Kingdom
Leora Auslander United States
Eduardo de la Fuente Australia
Christin J. Mamiya United States
Ariella Azoulay United States
Gene Ray relative to Abigail Solomon‐Godeau United States Abigail Solomon‐Godeau's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Abigail Solomon‐Godeau · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gene Ray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gene Ray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene Ray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene Ray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gene Ray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene Ray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene Ray. The network helps show where Gene Ray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Gene Ray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gene Ray Line = papers co-authored together Gene Ray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1
Critique of Creativity: Precarity, Subjectivity and Resistance in the 'Creative Industries'
201163
2
Art and Contemporary Critical Practice: Reinventing Institutional Critique
200951
3 200514
4 200713
5
Terror and the Sublime in Art and Critical Theory: From Auschwitz to Hiroshima to September 11
200512
6 200411
7
Joseph Beuys, mapping the legacy
200111
8 20104
9
Art and Contemporary Critical Practice
20164
10 20043
11 20083
12 20032
13 20092
14 20042
15
The use and abuse of the sublime: Joseph Beuys and art after Auschwitz
19971
16 20071
17 19891
18 20091
19 20140

About Gene Ray

Gene Ray is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 19 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art, Politics, and Modernism (5 papers), Literature and Cultural Memory (2 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (2 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (2 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (1 paper) and Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (57 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (42 citations), Museology (25 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (10 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (76 citations). Gene Ray has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gerald Raunig, Henrik Lebuhn, Joseph Beuys, John  and Gregory Sholette. Their work appears in journals such as Third Text, Historical Materialism, Monthly Review, The Educational Forum and Yale journal of criticism/˜The œYale journal of criticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact