Stephen DeBacker
Impact in
- Mathematical Physics top 5%
- Advanced Algebra and Geometry
- advanced mathematical theories
- Geometry and Topology top 2%
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
- Geometry and complex manifolds
- Geometric and Algebraic Topology
Papers in
-
- Advanced Algebra and Geometry 12
- advanced mathematical theories 2
-
- Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory 10
- Algebraic structures and combinatorial models 5
- Co-authors
- Mark Reeder (2 shared papers)Harish-chandra Harish-Chandra (1 shared paper)Paul Sally (1 shared paper)Jeffrey D. Adler (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Michigan Mathematical Journal (3 papers)Annals of Mathematics (2 papers)Compositio Mathematica (2 papers)Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society (1 paper)Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stephen DeBacker
13 papers receiving 244 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 16
- Mathematical Physics 274
- Geometry and Topology 252
- Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 86
- Algebra and Number Theory 45
- Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 4
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen DeBacker
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen DeBacker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen DeBacker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen DeBacker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen DeBacker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen DeBacker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen DeBacker. The network helps show where Stephen DeBacker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Stephen DeBacker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 54 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 30 | |
| 4 | 2002 | 28 | |
| 5 | 2002 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 14 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 1 |
About Stephen DeBacker
Stephen DeBacker is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Algebra and Number Theory and Media Technology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Algebra and Geometry (12 papers), Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (10 papers), Algebraic structures and combinatorial models (5 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (4 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (2 papers), advanced mathematical theories (2 papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (1 paper) and Online and Blended Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (274 citations), Geometry and Topology (252 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (86 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (45 citations) and Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (4 citations). Stephen DeBacker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mark Reeder, Harish-chandra Harish-Chandra, Paul Sally and Jeffrey D. Adler. Their work appears in journals such as The Michigan Mathematical Journal, Annals of Mathematics, Compositio Mathematica, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society and Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.