Stephen Chadwick

27 papers receiving 444 citations

Peers

Stephen Chadwick
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Orthodontics 236
  • General Dentistry 66
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 37
  • Oral Surgery 78
  • Periodontics 31
Replace Sahar Albarakati with:
Sahar Albarakati Saudi Arabia
Amal I. Linjawi Saudi Arabia
Lorne D. Koroluk United States
Ahmad Hamdan Jordan
Robert G Keim United States
Tate H. Jackson United States
Shivaughn Marchan Trinidad and Tobago
Trevor Hodge United Kingdom
W. David Brunson United States
Mônica Vilela Heimer Brazil
Stephen Chadwick relative to Sahar Albarakati Saudi Arabia Sahar Albarakati's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Sahar Albarakati · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Chadwick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Chadwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Chadwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Chadwick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Chadwick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Chadwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Chadwick. The network helps show where Stephen Chadwick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Chadwick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen Chadwick Line = papers co-authored together Stephen Chadwick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003128
2 200146
3 199537
4 200634
5 200230
6 200228
7 200123
8 201020
9 199519
10 199519
11 199315
12 200111
13
The Revision Process in Academic Writing: From Pen & Paper to Word Processor.
198910
14 19999
15 19958
16 20227
17 20206
18 20026
19 20165
20 20094

About Stephen Chadwick

Stephen Chadwick is a scholar working on Orthodontics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, General Dentistry and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 480 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics (9 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Dental Research and COVID-19 (5 papers), dental development and anomalies (5 papers), Dental Education, Practice, Research (4 papers), Dental Trauma and Treatments (4 papers), Dental materials and restorations (3 papers) and Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Orthodontics (236 citations), General Dentistry (66 citations), Complementary and Manual Therapy (37 citations), Oral Surgery (78 citations) and Periodontics (31 citations). Stephen Chadwick has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include P H Gordon, David Bearn, Laura E. Mitchell, Jean L. Wright, C. R. Mattick, Declan T Millett, Kevin O’Brien, Tatiana V. Macfarlane, Nathan Manning and Nicky Kilpatrick. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal Of Dental Education, International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, European Journal of Orthodontics, Radiotherapy and Oncology and American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact