Stephen C. Loftus

672 citations
7 papers · 500 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Stephen C. Loftus

7 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Stephen C. Loftus
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Microbiology 139
  • Global and Planetary Change 206
  • Ecological Modeling 30
  • Dermatology 53
  • Genetics 42
Replace Brandon Sheafor with:
Brandon Sheafor United States
Sherril L. Green United States
Gregory E. Jordan United Kingdom
N Tomassini United States
Roberta Ferrari Italy
Toshihiro Tokiwa Japan
Riikka Holopainen Finland
Kosuke Okada Japan
Michael J. Blair United States
Amanda Haigh New Zealand
Stephen C. Loftus relative to Brandon Sheafor United States Brandon Sheafor's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
Brandon Sheafor · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen C. Loftus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen C. Loftus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen C. Loftus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen C. Loftus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen C. Loftus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen C. Loftus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen C. Loftus. The network helps show where Stephen C. Loftus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Stephen C. Loftus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen C. Loftus Line = papers co-authored together Stephen C. Loftus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2014202
2 201599
3 201579
4 202063
5 201250
6 20226
7
On the Use of Grouped Covariate Regression in Oversaturated Models
20151

About Stephen C. Loftus

Stephen C. Loftus is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Microbiology, Molecular Biology, Pharmacology and Genetics, having authored 7 papers that have together received 500 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Amphibian and Reptile Biology (4 papers), Reproductive tract infections research (2 papers), Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (2 papers), Advanced Statistical Methods and Models (1 paper), Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics (1 paper), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (1 paper), Traffic and Road Safety (1 paper) and Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (139 citations), Global and Planetary Change (206 citations), Ecological Modeling (30 citations), Dermatology (53 citations) and Genetics (42 citations). Stephen C. Loftus has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Panama and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Leanna House, Lisa K. Belden, Matthew H. Becker, Jenifer B. Walke, Roderick V. Jensen, Kevin P. C. Minbiole, Andrew R. Kemper, Michael L. Madigan, Christopher T. Franck and Daniel Medina. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Microbiology, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, The ISME Journal, Journal of neurosurgery and Accident Analysis & Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact